Archive for the ‘history’ Category

International relations 1919-1939

The story of international relations 1919-1939 is the story of how Europe slid from the Peace Treaty of Versailles into the Second World War.   Historians have suggested five causes of the World War II: the Treaty of Versailles, the failure of the League of Nations, the foreign policy of Adolf Hitler, appeasement and the Nazi Soviet Pact.

The key to this period is to see it as a connected whole, and not as three separated topics – Treaty of Versailles, League of Nations and ‘the Road to World War II’.   Rather, everything worked together to move Europe into war.

The Versailles Conference

World War I ended on 11 November 1918 when Germany signed the ‘Armistice’.   The Versailles conference was opened in January 1919 and the Germans were forced to sign the Treaty on 28 June 1919.   THE ‘BIG THREE’ negotiators at Versailles were Georges Clemenceau (President of France), Woodrow Wilson (President of America) and David Lloyd George (Prime Minister of Britain).

Clemenceau wanted revenge and punishment – to ‘make Germany pay’ until Germany was too weak to attack France again.
Woodrow Wilson had said what he wanted in his 14 Points – a world ‘safe for democracy’ based on self-determination and a League of Nations.
Lloyd George SAID he wanted to make Germany pay, but he really wanted to protect the British Empire and trade by a lasting peace which would not ruin Germany

 
The Treaty of Versailles

The only answer here is that you have to learn the terms off by heart:

  1. By clause 231 of the Treaty, Germany had to accept blame ‘for all the loss and damage’of the war.
  2. The Germans were allowed no submarines or aeroplanes, only 6 battleships, their army was reduced to 100,000 men and the Rhineland was de-militarised.
  3. Germany had to pay £6,600 million reparations.
  4. Germany lost Alsace-Lorraine (to France), the Saar coalfield (to France for 15 years) and West Prussia and Upper Silesia (to Poland).   Danzig became a ‘free city’ and all the German colonies became ‘mandates’ of the League of Nations.
  5. The Treaty of Versailles set up the League of Nations.
  6. Germany was forbidden to unite (Anschluss) with Austria.

Although it is not directly in the syllabus, you need to know that the principles of the Treaty of Versailles were applied to the peace treaties for the whole of Europe after the War – Saint Germain (with Austria, 1919), Neuilly (with Bulgaria, 1919), Trianon (with Hungary, 1920)  and Sèvres (with Turkey, 1920).

Nine new nation-states were set up (Poland, Finland, Austria, Hungary, Czechoslovakia, Yugoslavia, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania), and the Treaty of Sevres dismantled the Turkish Empire.


Reactions to the Treaty

MUCH more important were the reactions of the different parties to the treaty:

The Germans were furious.   They had not been consulted during the making of the Treaty, the Treaty bore no relation to Wilson’s 14 Points (which they thought was going to be the basis of the treaty – e.g. Austria did not get self-determination), and they believed that the Treaty was simply an attempt to destroy Germany.   Count Brockdorff-Rantzau said of the war-guilt clause: ‘Such a confession in my mouth would be a lie’.   The Deutsche Zeitung attacked ‘the disgraceful treaty’.   In March 1920 there was a rebellion in Germany – called the Kapp Putsch – against the Treaty.

But even the people who made the Treaty were dissatisfied with it.

Clemenceau LIKED Clause 231, disarmament, Reparations and Alsace-Lorraine BUT he wanted Germany split up.
Wilson GOT League of Nations and self-determination for the countries of eastern Europe BUT he could not get disarmament or freedom for the colonies AND the American Senate refused to sign Treaty or join League of Nations.
Lloyd George LIKED reducing German navy and getting British mandates BUT he thought the Treaty was too harsh and would cause another war in 25 years time.

Historians have suggested that – because of this – the Treaty of Versailles CAUSED the Second World War.   Firstly, it infuriated the Germans, who were just waiting for an opportunity to get revenge, but secondly it demoralised the allies, who therefore could not bring themselves to make Germany obey the Treaty when Hitler started breaking it in the 1930s (thus the Treaty directly caused appeasement).


Reparations

Particularly, the Allies failed to enforce the treaty provisions relating to REPARATIONS:

In March 1921, French, British and Belgian troops invaded the Ruhr to force Germany to agree to reparations.
In January 1923, French and Belgian troops invaded the Ruhr to force Germany to pay reparations (this was a disaster, and caused hyperinflation in Germany).
In April 1924, the Dawes Plan gave Germany longer to pay reparations, and granted huge loans to get the German economy going.   (In June 1929, the Young Plan reduced reparations.)
On 8 September 1926, Germany was admitted to the League of Nations.

 

 

The League of Nations

Wilson was more bothered about the League than about anything else.   The League was his ‘parliament’ which would solve international disputes by discussion, and would do away with war.

The first 26 points of the Treaty of Versailles formed the Articles of the League (known as the ‘Covenant’; the principles that every member country promised to follow).   These laid down the aims of the League ( to stop war, uphold the Treaty of Versailles, organise disarmament and promote the health and well-being of people via the League’s economic and social agencies.   The Treaty also laid down the powers/methods of the League – the ‘Community of Power’ (acting together), arbitration (acting as a referee) and sanctions (stopping trade).   The Treaty said the League could raise an army, but – since this would have to be paid for by the countries which provided the soldiers, it never did.

The main meetings of the League was the Assembly (held once a year/ decisions only by unanimous vote) – although it had a smaller Council (met 4-5 times a year, with 5 permanent members – Britain, France, Italy, Japan and, after 1936, Germany – each with a veto) which dealt with crises.   The League also had a number of ‘agencies’ to do its economic and social work: the Court of International Justice, the Health Committee (later the WHO), the International Labour Organisation, the  Refugees Committee, the Slavery Commission and the Mandates Commission (monitored former German colonies which were being administered by France and Britain).


Successes of the League in the 1920s

Initially, the League seemed to do quite well.   It took its authority from the Treaty of Versailles – a treaty agreed to by almost all the countries in the world – and it counted many countries as active members (42 countries at the start, 60 by the 1930s).   The leading members – Britain and France, helped by Japan and Italy – were world powers.   Four significant successes were:

  1. Aaland Islands, 1921: arbitration: the League said the islands should belong to Finland.   Both Sweden and Finland agreed.
  2. Bulgaria, 1925: moral condemnation: Greece invaded Bulgaria, but withdrew when Bulgaria appealed to the League.
  3. Kellogg-Briand Pact, 1928, 65 countries agreed to outlaw war.
  4. Other successes: 400,000 Prisoners of War were returned to their homes, and in 1922 the League intervened to help Turkish refugees.   The League did a lot of stop leprosy, it closed down some drugs companies in Switzerland, and it organised attacks on slave owners in Africa and Burma.


Weaknesses and Failure

However, the League had serious weaknesses.   It was pledged to uphold the Treaty of Versailles, which everybody hated; this made it unpopular.   Its Secretariat (which did all administration, including tracking millions of missing persons after the War) was woefully undermanned.   Its powers – arbitration and condemnation – were ‘moral’ arguments that a determined country could ignore, and many countries refused to agree to sanctions because they damaged the member countries as much as the country that was doing wrong.   Worst of all, it lacked the support of the really powerful nations; America was never a member, the USSR not until 1934, Germany only in 1926-33, and Britain and France would not use their armies – instead they followed the policy of appeasement.   The crisis in Corfu, in 1923, proved to be an omen of things to come: an Italian General Tellini was murdered, so Italy occupied Corfu.   The League ordered Mussolini to leave, but Italy was big and strong enough to ignore it – in the end, the League forced Greece to pay compensation to Italy.

The League depended on nations agreeing.   This proved possible to achieve in the prosperous 1920s, but failed in the economic depression of the 1930s.   The League therefore failed in the 1930s:

1931: Disarmament: the conference was wrecked by Germany, which demanded equality with the other countries.
1931: Manchuria: Japan invaded Manchuria.   The League sent officials (took a year), then said that Japan ought to return Manchuria – so in February 1933 Japan resigned from the League.   The members of the League could not agree to economic sanctions or even an arms sales ban, so nothing was done.
1935: Abyssinia: Mussolini invaded Abyssinia. The League objected, but Italy ignored it and Britain and France secretly agreed to give Abyssinia to Italy!   Attempts to impose sanctions on arms sales, rubber and metals failed.   So nothing happened.
1933–1939: Germany: rearmed (1933-), re-occupied Rhineland (1936), Anschluss with Austria (1938), given Sudetenland (1938), invaded Poland (1939).

These failures killed the League – countries lost faith in the League, left and began to prepare for war instead.   In this way, the failure of the League was one of the causes of World War Two.

 

 

Hitler as a Cause of World War Two

So far, we have seen how historians have blamed both the Treaty of Versailles and the League of Nations for helping to cause World War Two – mainly because they FAILED to keep the peace.

Most historians, however, blame Adolf Hitler as a POSITIVE cause of war.    Hitler cam to power with aims in foreign policy which he had stated clearly in Mein Kampf (1924) – he was determined to destroy the Treaty of Versailles, defeat Communism and make Germany great.   Some historians claim that Hitler intended a World War from the very beginning, others merely that – in pursuing these aims – he systematically drew Europe into war:

 

1933 Rearmament Hitler built up his army, navy and airforce in secret, then openly. Britain and France did nothing.
1936 Rhineland He sent the Germany army back into the Rhineland. Britain and France did nothing.
1938 Austria He got the Austrian Nazis to make trouble, then invaded Austria. Britain and France did nothing.
1938 Sudetenland He got Sudetenland Nazis to cause trouble, and threatened to invade. At Munich, Chamberlain gave Hitler the Sudetenland.
1939 Czechoslovakia Hitler invaded the rest of Czechoslovakia Britain promised to defend Poland.
1939 Poland He got the Danzig Germans to cause trouble.   He made an alliance with Russia, agreeing to split up Poland.  Then he invaded. Britain declared war.


Appeasement

What were the other nations of Europe doing whilst Hitler was doing this?   By the 1930s, Britain and France had ditched the Treaty of Versailles and the League of Nations as the way to keep the peace, and were pursuing instead a policy which came to be called ‘appeasement’.

Nowadays the British Prime Minister Chamberlain and the French Prime Minister Daladier are often represented as weak and spineless cowards who gave the bully Hitler what he wanted in the hope that it would prevent a war.   However, Chamberlain and Daladier saw it merely as ‘being reasonable’; allowing Hitler’s ‘reasonable’ claims in the belief that he was a reasonable man who would stop when he had achieved his aims.   Besides this, there were strong arguments for a policy of appeasement in the 1930s:

  1. Chamberlain feared another war would destroy civilisation.
  2. The British people wanted peace and as leader of a democracy.
  3. Many British people agreed with Hitler that the Treaty of Versailles was not fair.
  4. Many British people feared Russia more than Germany.
  5. Many British people felt that events in Europe were not Britain’s business.
  6. Britain was too weak to help – Munich gave Britain 1 year to rearm.

However, both Hitler and Stalin saw it as cowardice and weakness.   The historian AJP Taylor blamed Chamberlain and Daladier for World War II – he argued that by continually giving in to Hitler they TEMPTED Hitler to go further and further, and thus encouraged him into war (like entrapment).

The policy of appeasement ended during the year after Munich (1938-9).   Perhaps the greatest cause of this change was Hitler’s invasion of Czechoslovakia in March 1939 (which showed he could not be trusted and turned the British people against him).    Another major incident was the German Nazis’ attacks on the Jews on Kristallnacht in November, 1938 (which convinced British people that the Nazis were evil).   Winston Churchill’s speeches continually warned people about Hitler, and of the need to stand up to him.


The Nazi Soviet Pact

In August 1939, Hitler and Stalin made an alliance.   Hitler gave Stalin half of Poland to let him invade Poland – it was the final cause of the war, because it gave Hitler the go-ahead to invade Poland.

Yet Stalin had originally asked Britain for an alliance with Russia against Hitler!   Why did this not happen?

1.       The British feared Communism.   They went slowly.   They sent a minor official who did not have the power to make decisions.   Stalin did not trust Britain.   He thought that if he allied himself to Britain he would end up fighting Hitler on his own.

2.       Hitler moved quickly.   He sent Ribbentrop, a senior government minister.   He offered Stalin half of Poland.   Stalin hated Hitler, but if he allied himself with Hitler he would get half of Poland without fighting, and he would have more time to prepare for war with Germany.

 

Advertisements

History HL practice exam PAPER 1

Posted: January 16, 2011 in history

I was looking for some help in what I should know before doing the paper1 in History. I cam across these tips!

International Relations 1919-1936

What’s this topic about?

This Paper examines international relations 1918-1936 with emphases on the Paris Peace Settlement (its making, impact and problems of enforcement) and attempts during the period to promote collective security and international cooperation through

– The League of Nations and multilateral agreements (outside the League mechanism),

– Arms reduction

– The pursuit of foreign policy goals without resort to violence.

It also requires consideration of the extent to which the aims of peacemakers and peacekeepers were realised and what the obstacles were to success.

 

Content of the Course

• Introduction and Overview

• Aims of the participants and peacemakers: Wilson and the 14 Points

• Terms of the Paris Peace Treaties 1919-20: Versailles, St Germain, Trianon, Neuilly Sevres/Lausanne 1923

• The geopolitical and economic impact of the Treaties on Europe; the establishment and impact of the mandate system

• Enforcement of the provisions of the Treaties: US isolationism, the retreat from the Anglo-American Guarantee; disarmament: Washington, London, Geneva conferences

• The League of Nations: effects of the absence of major powers; the principle of collective security and early attempts at peacekeeping: 1920-1925

• The Ruhr Crisis: 1923-‘The Troubled Year’; Locarno and the ‘Locarno Spring’

• Depression and threats to international peace /collective security: Manchuria and Abyssinia

• Conclusions


How is this Paper assessed?

This is the Sources Paper

• The examination lasts 1 hour and is worth HL 20% and SL 30%.

• There are four questions and you must answer all of them. The maximum mark is 25.

• Sources will be primary or a mixture of primary and secondary; they may be written, pictorial, diagrammatic.

• The number of sources may vary but will not exceed six.

• Some questions will require you to use only the evidence in the source while others require you to use your own knowledge as well as the source/s. This is made clear in the questions.

 

You will demonstrate the following skills:

• Comprehension: put into your own words the explicit message of the source or parts of it

• Analysis: make inferences, perceive internal relationships, compare and contrast documents, persuasively explain the meaning and significance of a document or a combination of documents

• Evaluation: identify and evaluate different interpretations of events presented in the documents and evaluate the source material critically as historical evidence.

• Application: show understanding of the documents beyond what is possible from internal analysis alone, by applying relevant knowledge to them and by placing documents in a wider historical context.

• Synthesis; synthesis relevant knowledge at an appropriate level of conceptual sophistication. Make clear the connection between your knowledge and the document: link your knowledge the source.

 

Some History HL Exam TIPS :)

Posted: January 14, 2011 in history

Today we were going through some old exams and reading through the rules during the exams. My teacher advised us on what to focus on in each Paper, hope it helps!

Paper 1 SL + HL 45 minutes

  • Either The Middle East OR International Affairs in Europe 1919-1936
  • Based on written sources

Paper 2 SL + HL 1 hour 45 minutes

  • Topic 3
    • Dictatorships
    • Focus on Hitler and Stalin
  • Topics 5
    • The Cold War
    • Focus on 1945-70
  • Topic 1
    • War
    • WW1 + 2 Korea, Vietnam (Spain)

For Paper 2 read up on GERMANY and RUSSIA/SOVIET UNION a lot!

Paper 3 HL 2 hours 30 minutes

  • 20 questions arranged chronologically
  • Go for 1800’s, Prussia/Imperial Germany
  • 3 out of 20 questions
  • Alexander 2 (Italy)
  • WW1+2
  • Hitler, Stalin, CW

Also focus on GERMANY and RUSSIA/SOVIET UNION

So basically for me I should focus on German, Russian/Soviet Union and Middle Eastern History, but still read briefly through the other dictators.

Short term effect (1919-1924)= The French Era/Period

  • A harsh implementation of the Treaty of Versailles

– Germany :

  • War Guilt -> reparations
  • Territorial losses (Pol Corr)
  • The Rhineland -> WW2

– Austria :

  • A shattered Eastern Europe
  • National minorities

– Ottoman Empire :

  • A sovereign Turkey
  • The Mandates ( splitting the countries between Britain/France)

– The US :

  • Isolationism 1941

– Italy :

  • Gained to the little territory -> MUSSOLINI

The way to WW2 (1925-39)

– Germany :

  • Revanchism -> HITLER
  • Wall Street Crash-> Ended the Daws Plan -> The German Economy fell
  • The Stab-in-the-back myth

– Eastern Europe :

  • Authoritarian rule (exception: Czechoslovakia)

Long Term effect

– Czechoslovakia :

  • Czech Republic and Slovakia-> Croatia, Serbia, Slovakia

Middle East :

  • The Arab-Israeli Conflict 1947
  • Iraq 1990

Sum up of the lesson

Posted: January 13, 2011 in history

WW1

1919-1924: The French Period = A harsh interpretation of the Treaty of Versailles

Germany couldn’t pay the reparations ->

The Genoa Conference 1922-

  • The Treaty Rapallo 1922 – Germany and the USSR struck a deal; The M-R Pact 1939
  • 1923 The Ruhr Crisis -> The Daws Plan 1924

1925 Locarno – the spirit of Locarno, germany re-emerged as a great power

The way to WW2

The spirit of Locarno

US/Europe

1929

The wall street crash-> A.H.

The Anglo-German 1935 Naval treaty ->A.H